1- Pihak China Hindu Kristian di Malaysia
cukup kurang ajar dan biadap apabila mereka terus menghasut walaupun DS Najib
berada di Bandar Holy See, Vatican City, Italy, bersama-sama dengan Pope
Benedict.
2- Kali ini mereka menghantar Surat kepada
Pope Benedict mengadu perihal Malaysia yang dikatakan menindas orang-orang
Kristian.
3- Sebenarnya, dimana sahaja bangsat-bangsat China
dan Hindu ini berada, walau dalam bentuk apa sekali pun, samaada Kristian atau Buddha,
mereka tetap akan menjadi penghasut dan pencetus huru-hara. Pokok panggalnya mereka adalah China dan India.
4- Lihat surat dibawah yang dikatakan
ditandatangani oleh 365 manusia China India dari Malaysia. Ia dipetik dari
Aliran. Isi kandongan terbahagi kepada tajuk-tajuk utama yang cukup menyakitkan
hati kepada sesiapa yang membacanya. Ia sudah cukup untuk membuktikan bahawa
mereka adalah pengkhianat negara yang semakin berani berkurang hajar di Tanah
Melayu.
Christian-Muslim
dialogue.
(Najib) Cakap tak
serupa bikin.
Najib’s heavy
handed response to the Walk for Democracy.
Manipulating
ethnoreligious sentiments.
Freedom of religion.
Visiting the
Vatican to stay in power?
5- KDN Hishamuddin harus bertindak segera
terhadap 365 individu pengkhianat kepada tanahair kerana ia jelas satu
penghasutan dan penghinaan nyata. Undang-undang Kanun Keseksaan patut di applikasi segera.
The letter in full:
His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI
Apostolic Palace
00120 Vatican City
Via
His Grace Archbishop Leopoldo Girelli
Apostolic Delegate to Malaysia
55 Waterloo Street #06
Singapore 1877954
Your Holiness
Recent
Political and Social Developments in Malaysia: Towards a More Comprehensive
Understanding of the Realities in Malaysia
We are a group of Catholics and some from
other Christian denominations in Malaysia. Malaysia, a Muslim-dominant country,
has a population of 28 million people with 2.2 million registered as Christians,
of whom an estimated 850,000 are Catholics.
We write to you with regards to our prime
minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s official visit to the Vatican on 18 July
2011. We are anxious about recent developments concerning
questions of democratic rights and religious freedom in Malaysia. In our
letter we highlight these issues in order to help Your Holiness understand more
critically and comprehensively the political and social realities in our
country lest you are presented with a one-sided view of developments in
Malaysia.
A
watershed
The Malaysian media has reported that the
visit of our prime minister to the Vatican is a ‘watershed’ that foreshadows
the establishment of diplomatic relations between Malaysia and the Holy See.
We believe that the establishment of
diplomatic ties between the Vatican and Malaysia is a good step forward; after
all, Malaysia is one of only 17 countries in the world that does not yet have
diplomatic ties with the Holy See. Our concern is that of the timing in establishing
these ties, on which we elaborate below.
Christian-Muslim
dialogue
Church sources in Malaysia inform us that the
visit also has to do with the Holy Father’s desire to promote Christian-Muslim
dialogue, an initiative that you wisely began to undertake beginning from 2005,
shortly after you assumed the papacy. It
might be that you find this sixth prime minister of Malaysia an attractive
dialogue partner given that he goes around the globe
promoting himself as the leader of a moderate Muslim country made up of various
ethnic groups. As well, he has called for the formation of a ‘Global
Movement of the Moderates’ and that it ought to take centre stage in the
international arena.
We believe that there are lessons that one can
draw from the Malaysian experience. For ordinary Malaysians of different races
and faith are respectful of one another’s beliefs and customs, and have learnt
to co-operate and live peacefully side-by-side. However,
this is so in spite of the shameful conduct of some of our political leaders
who have unabashedly manipulated ethno-religious sentiments all these years,
and mobilized on ethno-religious grounds in
order to stay in power.
Cakap
tak serupa bikin
Indeed, the conduct of prime minister Najib
and his Barisan Nasional (BN) government at home, at least recently, has been
anything but moderate! In our Malaysian colloquialism, we
might say of the prime minister that ‘dia cakap tak serupa bikin’, meaning that ‘he does not do what he
preaches’, or that ‘he does not walk the talk’!
In this regard, we are very concerned about
the timing of this official visit which follows immediately after recent
repression of civil society groups which are fighting for clean and fair
elections. We are also deeply concerned that some top leaders of this
democratic initiative have been painted unjustly as ‘anti-Islam’ by the
authorities without any basis whatsoever. Below we highlight a few recent
events and episodes.
Najib’s
heavy handed response to the Walk for Democracy
Just last week on July 9, 2011, there occurred
the controversy-ridden ‘Walk for Democracy’ that was initiated by the coalition
of 62 NGOs calling themselves Berish 2.0 (bersih meaning ‘clean’ in Malay, our
national language). The coalition had wanted to hold a peaceful street walk in
support of an 8-point program to institutionalize clean and fair elections.
Numerous glaring incidences that have occurred in past elections as reported in
the media, and recounted and confirmed in studies by
major researchers, have indicated that Malaysia’s electoral system and the
conduct of these elections have not been free and fair. Significantly, Malaysia
has been ruled by a single party – the BN coalition dominated by Najib’s United
Malays National Organisation (UMNO) – since independence in 1957, more than 54
years ago!
It was on account of frustrations arising from
these inadequacies in the electoral system that Bersih was formed. Among
others, the respected Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and
Taoism, of which the Catholic church of Malaysia is a part, affirmed Bersih’s
right to conduct this peaceful walk for what it considered ‘just demands’.
In deference to the king, who intervened to
head off a potential confrontation between Bersih supporters and its extremist
detractors including from UMNO Youths, Bersih opted to hold a rally in the
Stadium Merdeka. Yet Najib’s BN government declared that Bersih was ‘an illegal
organization’ and its proposal to hold the gathering in the Stadium was
rejected by the authorities. On the eve of the gathering, a court order was
obtained to ban 91 leaders of Bersih and the Opposition (and also those from
anti-Bersih groups) from entering those parts of Kuala Lumpur around Stadium
Merdeka under threat of ‘arrest on sight’.
Earlier, Najib’s government had even banned
the wearing of yellow Bersih T-shirts. The Bersih office was raided and six of
their office workers were arrested. Bersih supporters who participated in
‘roadshows’ to publicise the upcoming event were also arrested. Six of them,
also members of the Parti Sosialis Malaysia, were subsequently detained under
the Emergency Ordinance (a Detention without Trial law) and are now held under
solitary confinement. A leading lawyer has described these developments as signifying
Malaysia’s descent into ‘a police state’.
In the event, the police came down hard on
Bersih supporters who turned up for the gathering in Kuala Lumpur on July 9.
The police set up road blocks and barb-wire fences manned by hundreds of
policemen thus creating huge traffic jams throughout the city. To disperse the
Bersih supporters, the police resorted to use of water cannons and fired tear
gas into the crowd, as though the people were the enemy. A total of 1,667
people including 151 women and 16 children were arrested. What was singularly
laudable was that there was no incidence of violence on the part of the tens of
thousands of Bersih supporters who came from all ethnoreligious backgrounds.
Yet, prime minister Najib has claimed that the
police had acted professionally, and condemned Bersih and the Opposition for
tarnishing the image of the country. We urge you Holy Father and your Vatican
officials to view the video clips that were taken of the goings-on.
Significantly, the Bar Council of Malaysia has commented that the police had
‘used force excessively’.
Manipulating
ethnoreligious sentiments
Tellingly, two days before the July 9 event,
Najib had addressed a gathering of Malay silat (martial arts) exponents whence,
reportedly, he suggested that the silat groups could be mobilized as a third
line of defence against enemies from within and outside the country.
More than this, on July 2 in a gathering of
about 20,000 people in the town of Kota Baru, Najib, in a live
broadcast over Radio Malaysia, described
Ambiga Sreenevasan, the chairperson of Bersih, as ‘a threat to Islam’ for the
watching brief she held as the then president of the Bar Council in the Lina
Joy case a few years earlier.
Freedom
of religion
Lina Joy was a Muslim woman who converted to
Catholicism before marrying a member of the faith. She filed against the
Registration Department for registering her religion as ‘Islam’ in her MyKad
(identity card) although she had converted out of the religion.
In spite of the dismissal of her case, it was
popularly understood by many Malaysians, especially non-Muslims, that this was
a violation of the freedom of religion guaranteed in the Federal Constitution.
Najib’s labeling Ambiga as a threat to Islam is a deliberate distortion of her
professional role as legal counsel in the Lina Joy case.
In the event, this Lina Joy case arises from a
conflict between two legal jurisdictions – the civil law versus shariah law –
that have emerged in Malaysia. In recent years, a number of cases involving the
conversion of minors to Islam without the knowledge of the other spouse; the
custody of children and/or the question of maintenance following the conversion
to Islam of one spouse; the question of inheritance and even funeral
arrangements following the death of a spouse who had purportedly converted to
Islam without his family’s knowledge, have been highly controversial. In these
cases, the non-Muslim litigants often found themselves helplessly trapped
between or confined to only one of concurrent jurisdictions since they do not
have locus standi in the shariah court.
Mention should also be made of the Court case
between the Catholic church and the Malaysian government regarding the church’s
use of the word Allah in the Catholic weekly The Herald. The government had
ruled that the word Allah should be confined to use among Muslims only. At this
point, a final decision has yet to be made by the Court.
Related to the above was the controversy over
the importation and distribution of the Malay bibles which contained the word
Allah. One shipment of these Bibles was held back by the Home Ministry
authorities for several years and the matter was taken to Court. Although the
Bibles were released in early 2011, unnecessary conditions have been imposed on
their importation into peninsula Malaysia, to the dissatisfaction of
Christians.
We highlight these episodes to you Holy Father
because you have made the defence of the freedom of religion an important plank
of your papacy.
Visiting
the Vatican to stay in power?
Finally, there is concern among us that Najib
is also reaching out to the Holy See at this juncture in order to secure
popular support in the forthcoming general election due by early 2013. In the
previous 2008 election, the multiracial, multireligious Opposition coalition in
Malaysia performed very well and succeeded in denying the BN government a
two-thirds’ majority in parliament (which had previously allowed the BN
government to freely amend the Federal Constitution at will). The Opposition
coalition also won an unprecedented 5 out of the 13 state governments. In fact,
the BN government lost the popular vote to the Opposition in peninsula
Malaysia.
The reason why the BN was returned to power in
the 2008 election was because it had secured virtually all the parliamentary
seats in the states of Sabah and Sarawak located on the island of Borneo. In
other words, the victory of the BN (as well as for the Opposition) in the
upcoming election will depend on how well it performs in those two states.
In this regard, it is significant to note that
Christians constituted 43 per cent of the population in Sarawak in 2000, and 28
per cent of the population in Sabah as recorded in the 2000 Census. We are
suspicious that this official visit by Najib and his BN colleagues to the Holy
See will be used by the BN leaders politically i.e. to secure votes for the BN
from the Christians in Sabah and Sarawak. It is not inconceivable that
photographs of Najib standing alongside the Holy Father will be widely
distributed throughout the two states, particularly in the rural areas where
the Christian indigenous people predominate, in the run-up to the next
election.
It is with the concerns described above that
we submit this letter to you Holy Father.
- - While we welcome the establishment
of diplomatic relations between our country Malaysia and the Holy See, and we
do believe that Malaysia’s experience in inter-religious living and cooperation
has lessons to offer to other multireligious multiethnic societies,
nonetheless, we are wary about the timing of this visit by prime minister Najib
to the Vatican.
- - We are concerned that foreign governments and leaders who host him in his travels might be influenced by his pronouncements which extol the spirit of moderation, whereas in fact his government has used unnecessarily excessive force time and time again, the latest being its undemocratic treatment of civil society groups in Bersih’s Walk for Democracy episode.
- - We wish to highlight, too, how
prime minister Najib and other BN leaders, in trying to stem the popular
support for Bersih’s call for clean and fair elections, have manipulated ethnoreligious
sentiments irresponsibly and attempted to demonise Bersih leaders as
anti-Islam.
- - We also highlight how there have
been curbs to freedom of religion in fact, although this fundamental human
right is guaranteed in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.
- - We are also suspicious that there is a hidden political agenda to win electoral support among the Christians of Sabah and Sarawak in this visit to the Vatican.
Signatories
Aeria, Dr Andrew
Aneel David K
Angus, Valerie
Anjimin, Esther
Anthony, David
Anthony, Nicholas
Anthony, Richard
Armin, Delsie
Arnold, Raymond
Augustin, Yolanda
Beh, Augustin
Beh, Brenda
Beh, Francis
Beh, Belinda
Beh, Bernadette
Beh, Briget
Bendict, Jeremy
Benedict, Amanda
Benedict, Felix
Benedict, Jeffri
Benedict,Helen
Benjamin, Dorothy S
Benjamin, Lourdes, S
Benjamin, Merician S
Benjamin, Ronald
Bhar, Bernard
Boey, Anna
Bon, Gloria
Bro Anthony Rogers fsc
Bro John D’Cruz fsc
Brodie, Christopher
Cardosa, Dr. Mary Suma
Carina, Joellyne
Chahil, Sharon
Chan, Eunice
Chan, Lillian
Chang, Agatha
Chang, Francis
Chang, Alice
Chang, Jacob
Chang, Anna
Chang, Kevin
Chang, Lilian
Chang, Vivian
Chang, Joseph
Cheah Eng Thiam
Cheah, Ruth
Chee Kha King, Andrew
Chee, Amanda
Chee, Audrey
Chee, Belinda
Chan Joon Phei
Chee, Peter
Cheng Joon Hau
Cheng Yoon Sen
Cheng Yuin Mei
Cheng, Jason
Cheow, Geraldine Anne
Chew Lip Yin, Issac
Chia Mia Wan, Cynthia
Chia, Sophia
Chin Kon Seng, John
Chin Poh Choo
Chin Yee Whah
Chin, Leonard
Chin, Leoretta
Chin, Pax Angelo
Choo Nyon Yew
Choong, Vincent
Chop Noon Yew
Chow, Bernie
Chua Juay Jin
Chua, Christopher
Chua, Helen
Chung Jingyee
Curzon, Juelle
de Silva, Edda
de Vries, Abigail
Delph, Amy J.
Doh Mee Yuen
Ethan, Joash
Fah Hon Leong, James
Fernandez, Angeline Bones
Fernandez, Catherine
Fernandez, S a
Ferns, Jenevieve
Fong Li Kwan
Fong, Peter
Foo Chit Wai, Edmund
Foo Tet Sim, Elizabeth
Foo Tet Sin, Theresa
Foo Tet Tsin, Joan
Foo Tet Yoong, Barbara
Foo Tze Hiung, Colin
Foo, Angela
Foo, Audrey
Foo, Bernadine
Foo, Damian
Foo, Leonard
Foo, Nicholas
Foo, Susan
Foo, Tet Sin, Agatha
Foo, Theresa
Foo, Valentine
Fr Edmund Woon
Fr Fabian Dicom
Fr Jude Miranda
Fr Julian Leow
Fr Marshall Fernandez
Fr Simon Labrooy
Francis, Caroline
Francis, Franklin
Francis, Jennifer
Francis, Julienna
Francis, Maria Christina
Gasper, Margaret
Goh Chee Beng, Johnny
Goh, Helena
Goh, Kiat
Goh, Peggy
Gomez, Dr Terence
Gumbok, Felinsia
Harben, Dr Nilufer
Hector, Charles
Hew, Theresa
Ho, Alfred
Ho, Enoch
How Si Khoon, Jocelyn
Isnin, Rachel
Jalleh, Martin
Johnraj, Davis
Joseph, James Ponniah
Juhari, James
Kam, Margaret
Kang Hian Beng, Paul
Kee, Francis
Khek, Linus
Khoi Hoay Ling
Khoo Ah Poh
Khoo, Cynthia
Khoo. Philip
Khor, Anne
Kim S Choo
Koh, Ashley
Koh, Daniel
Koh, Hugh
Koh, John
Koh, Mark
Kok, Joan Elizabeth
Kuan, Amy
Kwan, Hung Weng
Kwan, Susanna
Lai Chen Chiong
Lai Chew Yong, Lucia
Lai Kong Meng, Francis
Lambin, Jessica
Lanson, Jairin
Lau Beng Teck, Michael
Lau, Aileen
Chee, Alexcius
Law, Clare
Law, Stephen
Lawrence, Leong
Lazaroo, Mandy Joan
Lean, Cindy
Lee Mae Yin, Josephine
Lee, Gerald
Lee, Margaret
Lee, Patricia
Leong Kok Soon, Patrick
Leong Pooi Yin, Pauline
Leong, Agatha
Leong, Debra Robert
Li Yi Phang
Lim Mah Hui, Dr Michael
Lim Sim Seng
Lim Swee Bin
Lim Thean Heng
Lim, Chin Chin Theresa
Lim, Jean
Lim, Joyce
Lim, Sophy
Lim, Susan
Liow Sook Ching
Lo, Emily
Loh Angeline
Loh Ci Yan, Sara
Loh Sook Yuin, Amy
Loh, Alexander
Loh, Arthur
Loh, Debbie
Loh, Joseph
Loh, Judith
Loh, Kee Wey Henry
Loh, Kok Wah Dr Francis
Loh, Lawrence
Loh, Mary Magdalene
Loh, Philomena
Long Took Chee, Andrew
Loo, Joakim
Loo, Randy
Looi, Adrian
Looi, Grace
Looi, Vincent
Looi, Vivien
Loong, Chris
Loong, Shane
Loorthusamy, Augustine
Lopez, Gregore Pio
Lowe Sook Yin, Christina
Martin, Erik
Mary, Genevieve
Moinsin, Jusni
Narayanam, Rajenthiran
Narayanan, Michael
Netto, Anil
Ng Choon Sim, Dr Cecilia
Ng Kok Aun
Ng Kok Moi
Ng Lai Leng,
Ng Liang Hock
Ng Swee Ming, Dr
Ng, John
Ng, Mary
Ng, Nita
Ng, Patricia
Ng, Rose
Nicholas, Dr Colin
Oh, Billy
Ong Hong Thong, Thomas
Ong Kay Chong
Ong Wing Khang, Lawrence
Ong, Adeno
Ong, Ellen
Ong, Leslie B K
Ong, Steffi
Ong, Stephanie
Ong, Thomas
Ooi Tze Qian, Angie
Ooi Wah Seng, Michael
Ooi, Corinth
Ooi, David
Ooi, Dick
Ooi, Frederick
Ooi, Gloria
Ooi, Issac
Ooi, Jacob
Ooi, Jeremy
Ooi, Joshua
Ooi, Seira
Ooi, Stephanie
Ooi, Timothy
Patrick, M B
Paul, Jack
Penafort, Robert
Pereira, Mary
Peter, Donecia
Phan Tze Wei, Eric
Phan Ying Ching, Mary A
Phan Ying Han, Erin
Phipps, Mary G
Phoa, Dr John
Phun, Florence
Quah Ai Siew, Christine
Quek, Anna
Quek, David
Quek, Dr David
Quek, Elaine
Quek, Henry
Quek, Jackie
Quek, Joseph
Quek, Julai
Quek, Kimberly
Quek, Lucia
Quek, Melissa
Quek, Thomas
Raiappan, Peter
Railim, Clarisya
Rajendra, Rebecca
Resha, Ellana
Rosaline, Daphne
Roy, Josef
Scott, Benjamin Patrick
Scott, Jennifer Caroline
Selvaraj, Jason
Sia Chay Thiam
Sibert, Dr Anthony
Sivapatham, Joycee
Soon Le Teck
Soosai, Jonathan
Soyza, Allan
Sr Lucy Theseira, IJ
Sr Marie Angele, IJ
Sr Stanislaus Thoo, IJ
Sr Winnie Khong, IJ
Sr. Dorothy Khaw IJ
Sr. Elaine Wong IJ
Sr. Mary Fletcher FMM
Surin, Raphael
Tan Jin Choon, Dominic
Tan Lai Imm
Tan Meow Min, Pauline
Tan Siew Hoon, Johanna
Tan Teck Keong
Tan, Aloysius
Tan, Catherine
Tan, Constance
Tan, Cynthia
Tan, David B C
Tan, Hans
Tan, James
Tan, Jamie
Tan, Jeanne
Tan, Jerene
Tan, Josephine
Tan, Joshua
Tan, Joyce
Tan, Lionel
Tan, Lynette
Tan, Sooi Beng, Dr
Tan, Violet
Tay, Angelina
Teo FH, Lisa
Teo CC, Wendy
Teo HF, Grace
Teo Kar Im
Teo, Ann
Teoh, Leonard
Tijah Yok Chopil
Toh Kin Woon, Dr Philip
Tuzan, Desonny Daning
Vincent, Angela
Wan, Vincent
Wee, Anthony
Wee, Geraldine
Wee, Vivien
Wong Ming Yew, Lionel
Wong, Adrian
Wong, Alice
Wong, Alison
Wong, Angie
Wong, Annie
Wong, Claire
Wong, Dominic
Wong, Raymund
Wong, Richard
Wong, Roderick
Wong, Wong
Wong. Andrew
Yeap Siew Lan
Yee Suk Yeen, Lynette
Yeo, Helen
Yeoh Beng Kim, Jonathan
Yeoh Hooi Kee, Daniel
Yeoh, Dylan
Yin Chueh Sheung, Christopher
Yip, Desmond
Yip, Jackie
Yip, Leona
Yip, Terina
Yong Hua Hin, John
Wong, John
Yong, Carol
Yong, Marie-Anne
Yoong, Michelle
Mereka yang tanda tangan surat itu hanya 365 orang saja dan tidak mewakili 28,000,000 penduduk negara ini.Atas dasar inclusiveness mereka di benar suara kan apa saja.
ReplyDeleteKita harus ingat siapa yang buka pintu luas daripada 2004 hingga 2008.
Hari ini tukang buka pintu menyatakan Orang Islam bolih terima unsur unsur yang baik dari agama lain.Ta sudah sudah mengundang kecacatan aqidah.
Namun demikian adalah hak mereka menulis surat,tetapi saya amat tak suka kalau kutuk orang Islam dan Islam dan bangsa Melayu...
Kalau mereka terus mengutuk dan mencabar jangan sangka laut tenang taada jerung.
arjuna waspada
changkat lobak.
HH,
ReplyDeleteKenapa la yang selalu buat masalah, yang selalu tak puas hati adalah dari keturunan hamba abdi yang dibawa oleh British? Orang yang atuk nenek mereka diberi ikhsan oleh orang Melayu. Apakah atuk nenek mereka dulu memang tak pernah ajar mereka?
Tenggara:-)
ReplyDeleteNi la masalah nya, kenapa 'Asal-Pendatang-Haram-kemudian-diberi-IC' ini yg selalu x puas hati dn timbul permusuhan. Apa depa nak sebenarnya?
Jadi mcm mana nak buat, Tuan?
I say, masalah negara dibahu kita pulak, kelas gituu Tuan.
Ana pernah idamkan supaya Presiden UMNO hatta Perdana Menteri kita yang berikut-ikutnya dari seorang Bekas General.
Apa macam Tuan? Setuju?
Muhyiddin Yasin lembik juga.
Anonm 00:16 cakap memang betui, sebab Pak Lah la yg buka pintu seluas-luasnya. Siapa yg berani nak tutup pintu ni kembali?
Kita disebelah sini sahaja yang marah, mereka disebelah sana relax saja, lebih2 lagi Hj Hadi,Nik Ajis, & Anuar Aljuburi,bukan setakat relax, bertepuk tangan lagi tanda gembira.
ReplyDeleteAnon 00:16:-)
ReplyDelete"Org Islam boleh terima Unsur-unsur yg baik dari KEPERCAYAAN lain"
Pak Lah ingat dalam Islam belum cukup unsur-unsur yg baik sehingga kena pinjam/tiru dari KEPERCAYAAN lain.
Kalu nak terjemah sekali kilas, nampak benar Pak Lah maksud belum cukup unsur baik dlm Islam. Nauzubillah.
Ngantuk aku baca surat dorang..rasanya kalau Pope, dah tertidur baca surat spekulasi macam ni..
ReplyDeleteSebelum ni ada segelintir kaum india hantar surat kepada Queen kononnya berlaku penghapusan kaum India kat Malaysia. Member aku bangsa india pun gelak baca cerita macam ni.
Skarang ada pulak segelintir puak kristian buat surat cerita pelik2 macam ni..
Agama mengajak kita bersatu..tapi yg ini ajak provokasi untuk berpecah pula..
Terima Kasih kepada penganut kristian lain yang tidak menyokong surat ini. Kerana mereka tahu isi surat tersebut separuh jalan sahaja..
separuh jalan cerita yang menceritakan keburukan sahaja..dan lagi separuh jalan cerita mengenai kebaikan telah ditiadakan.
-Udah Lah Tu Nuar-
bangsa asal pendatang di Tanah Melayu ni mana pernah sedar diri. Langsung tak sedar diuntung walau datuk nenek kita dah banyak bertolak ansur & sanggup kongsi semuanya.
ReplyDeletebangsa kafir tidak layu dan sentiasa mengatur strategi menjatuhkan umat islam tapi yg sedihnya bangsa melayu yg beragama islam kini lebih suka terikut2 dgn peredaran zaman yg di anggap moden lalu terlupa quran sepatutnya di contohi
ReplyDeleteInilah yang dikatakan ulat bulu dah naik daun.Mereka2 yang seramai 365 Kristian ini menggangap Malaysia sudah jadi neraka bagi dia orang.Oleh yang demikian eloklah mereka diberi pilehan sama ada menghormati negara ini atau pergi berambus kenegeri lain yang mereka anggap lebih bebas.Memang dasar khafir tu khafir juga. Dalam Quraan dah kata orang Khafir tak kan redhaw dengan Islam selama2nya. Tak faham2 ke orang Melayu di Malaysia ni?
ReplyDeleteSalam.
ReplyDeleteSekarang sudah jelas siapa dan apa mereka ini.
Tiada cara dan tiada guna lagi kita berfikir tentang "malapetaka" yang akhirnya akan menimpa bangsa Melayu yang beragama Islam, di bumi bertuah ini.
Marilah kita menenangkan fikiran dan merenung jauh ke hadapan, tentang untung nasib agama dan bangsa.
Marilah kita perbetulkan niat dan bekerja keras agar pemerintah negara yang ada sekarang ini dapat dipertahan dan kekalkan.
Fikirkanlah tentang generasi Melayu yang beragama Islam,semasa dan yang akan datang.
Semoga Allah bersama kita.
Senarai nama tu macam dibuat-buat je ... jika ade nombor IC baru saya boleh percaya !
ReplyDeleteBetul ... Anon 08:43 20/07 ... beri je mereka peluang duduk kat S'pore ... tempat mereka buat rujukan dan rayuan ... tak miskin Malaysia dgn 365 org tu.
Org Cheras.
tuan,
ReplyDeletemacamana lah caranya nak sedarkan masyarakat melayu IslaM yang selalu bercakaran dan suka memberontak/membangkang.
masyarakat melayu IslaM lebih suka berHasaD DengkI sesama muslim dan akan sentiasa menyebelahi pihak laen demi untuk di lihat AdvancE atau ElitE .
mungkin semua ini disebabkan darah daging mereka TumbuH dari makanan SubhaH atau diketegorikan HaraM dari cara perolehan nya iaitu dari unsur RibA' RasuaH JudI .
saya setuju andai pemimpin kita dari org yang JujuR dan TEGAS demi untuk memperbetulkan keadaan semasa. buatlah cara lama untuk mendidik seperti merotan.
apa guna ada undang undang kalau sekadar jadi hiasan dan permainan, apa guna beragama Islam tetapi tiada perpaduan UmmaH. jangan puji bangsa lain, umat lain tapi mencaci bangsa sendiri. jangan jadi BaruA.
nur zulaikha
johor
Inilah akibatnya bila kerakyatan diberi secara gratis... mereka adalah masyarakat takreti mengenang budi, didepan kita berlagak baik diblakang menyumpah seranah kita... bangsa gasar
ReplyDeletePuan Zulaika:-)
ReplyDelete"macam mana nak sedarkan Melayu Islam yg bercakaran"
Agak susah Puan oooii:-)
Satu jalan saja, kita tunggu penghasut-penghasut tua-tua supaya padam dan tamat tempoh.
Perhatikan betul-betul, berapa umur penghasut2 bertaraf general sekarang. Tua-tua belaka bukan.
Bermula dari:
Anwar,
Kit Siang,
Karpal,
Ambiga,
Hadik,
Pok Nicky,
Pak Samad
Lain-lain yg muda-muda tu ikut saja.
Kebanyakan nya dah sampai Level 6, Level 7 padam la kot.
Puan Level berapa sekarang?
Bangang...kalau nak ubah...ubah secara radikal. Korang yg bijak pandai sebok lagi nak mencemuh sesama Islam buat apa? Tak habis2 dgn politik....Bagi je agong yang memegang tampok pemerintahan negara mcm brunei bukannya pedana menteri habis cerita....maka diamlah si bangsa2 bangsat hamba abdi yg dibawa masuk ke negara ini masa zaman british dulu. kita ni terlalu LAYU bertolak ansur dgn diorg ni sampaikan kita sendiri yg bertelagah sesama sndiri. bubarkan semua parti politik kat negara ini....Bagi Agong yang pegang tampok pemerintahan negara....kalau nak dengar ayat menderhaka cuba lah lawan Agong lepas ni tengok.....LONG LIVE THE KING.....Fuck to all politician.
ReplyDelete